tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1011190131897264422.post5361891994314960133..comments2024-03-19T10:29:17.337-04:00Comments on Lara's Jewnealogy: Using Longest Segment in Endogamous DNA AnalysisLara Diamondhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01059622807880866607noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1011190131897264422.post-6260633882925517832020-06-24T08:08:45.283-04:002020-06-24T08:08:45.283-04:00Denise,
The following may be helpful:
Denise,
T...Denise,<br /><br />The following may be helpful:<br /><br /><a href="https://larasgenealogy.blogspot.com/2019/09/ashkenazic-shared-dna-survey-september.html" rel="nofollow">Denise,<br /><br />The following may be helpful:<br /><br />https://larasgenealogy.blogspot.com/2019/09/ashkenazic-shared-dna-survey-september.html</a>Lara Diamondhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01059622807880866607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1011190131897264422.post-21306214484556246032020-06-23T14:13:04.782-04:002020-06-23T14:13:04.782-04:00I am trying to estimate my relationship with this ...I am trying to estimate my relationship with this cousin:<br />largest segment 58.76cm, total 169cm; 12 segments. Against my brother she has largest 72.77cm, total 99cm, 4 segments. Her grandparents are first cousins and I believe I am related to both of them.<br /><br />23andme predicts 3C. I have some reasons to think she's a 4C. How much weight should I give these large segments? Is this within reason for a 4C? How likely is it? We are all 100% Ashkenazi. Thanks. denisehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05044633308040439940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1011190131897264422.post-60123745129762823462020-01-23T03:57:42.258-05:002020-01-23T03:57:42.258-05:00I match my jewish full sibling at 2251cm, is that ...I match my jewish full sibling at 2251cm, is that normal??? dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03279895187427259524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1011190131897264422.post-52146940637367554502019-08-13T17:22:52.971-04:002019-08-13T17:22:52.971-04:00This is not a mistake. I wrote about it here: htt...This is not a mistake. I wrote about it here: <a href="https://larasgenealogy.blogspot.com/2017/08/a-relationship-outlier.html" rel="nofollow">https://larasgenealogy.blogspot.com/2017/08/a-relationship-outlier.html</a>Lara Diamondhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01059622807880866607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1011190131897264422.post-41950803518804738202019-08-13T17:16:17.939-04:002019-08-13T17:16:17.939-04:00Dave - 3C - 281 cM - This is far beyond the maximu...Dave - 3C - 281 cM - This is far beyond the maximum for 3D (0-217cM in Shared DNA tool). Can you confirm this is not a mistake?einshemhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01565301363903178396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1011190131897264422.post-34139269731522738482016-11-29T15:48:44.644-05:002016-11-29T15:48:44.644-05:00Interesting thoughts to think about in terms of DN...Interesting thoughts to think about in terms of DNA analysis - thanks for sharingAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11817239481022387130noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1011190131897264422.post-1457941242279692922016-11-28T20:26:38.076-05:002016-11-28T20:26:38.076-05:00I look forward to your analysis!I look forward to your analysis!Amyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15720293202890878993noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1011190131897264422.post-57919803365184076602016-11-28T20:16:51.200-05:002016-11-28T20:16:51.200-05:00There I haven't seen the same sort of pattern....There I haven't seen the same sort of pattern. I'm planning on writing up some successes (and failures) for finding connections with looking at largest segment--and I can take a look at total shared to see if it makes a difference.Lara Diamondhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01059622807880866607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1011190131897264422.post-48162376567837441512016-11-28T09:05:19.361-05:002016-11-28T09:05:19.361-05:00I have also found this a more predictive method th...I have also found this a more predictive method than overall cM. But is there a minimum amount of cM you would look for as well? That is, I have some matches that share one long segment over 20 cM, but not much more than that. Is that one segment itself significant without much more shared? In any event, in this case, as in most cases, we've not been able to find a connection anyway.Amyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15720293202890878993noreply@blogger.com